dc.contributor.author | BOLUN, Ion | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-02T11:16:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-02T11:16:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citation | BOLUN, Ion. Monotonia unor metode „voturi-decizie” RP multiopţionale. In: Economica. 2014, N. 3(89), pp. 70-79. ISSN 1810-9136. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1810-9136 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.utm.md/handle/5014/18244 | |
dc.description.abstract | Sunt cercetate unele aspecte de monotonie ale metodelor Hamilton, Divizor liniar general şi Mixtă. Este demonstrat faptul că metoda Divizor liniar general este imună la paradoxurile Alabama, al Populaţiei şi al Noului stat. De asemenea, la două partide (state), metodele Hamilton şi Mixtă sunt imune la paradoxurile Alabama şi cel al Populaţiei; mai mult ca atât, metoda Mixtă este imună şi la paradoxul Noului stat. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Some monotony aspects of Hamilton, General Linear Divisor and Mixed „votes-decision” methods are investigated. It is proved that General Linear Divisor method is immune to Alabama, of Population and of New State paradoxes. At two parties (states), Hamilton and Mixed methods are immune to Alabama and of Population paradoxes; moreover, the Mixed method is immune to the New state paradox, too. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.language.iso | ro | en_US |
dc.publisher | Academia de Studii Economice din Moldova | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | monotonie | en_US |
dc.subject | monotony | en_US |
dc.subject | proportional representation | en_US |
dc.title | Monotonia unor metode „voturi-decizie” RP multiopţionale | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Monotony of some multioptional „votes-decision” PR methods | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
The following license files are associated with this item: